You can bring in all kinds of filmmakers to bring their own stories and culture. There is no expectation to continue a story or live up to what has come before. Every film is wholly unique and original, and they don’t rely on each other to succeed. I think another advantage to this approach is maintaining the freedom that sequels in other franchises aren’t really afforded. The Predator (Dane DiLiegro) and Naru (Amber Midthunder) in Prey. You can keep them cheap by focusing on the characters and the world you create and minimizing the presence of the Predator, and in turn, you can improve the film by giving the audience characters to care for. A film that takes place in a new interesting time period with characters from a new culture, and then plops a Predator in there on top of them. I think the much more appealing option for the sequel is to follow the same approach for Prey, all the way from the ground up. Is it really necessary to show the Predators doing something we know happens, especially when the final moments of the story already hint at the events? I’m not sure the answer is a resounding yes, especially when Naru’s story here was so strong and polished, to begin with. We know, based on Predator 2, that the pistol is retrieved in one way or another. I think it’s just as (if not more) likely that this moment was meant as a sort of epilogue. While I think in the age of modern blockbuster filmmaking, it’s fair to assume this was meant as a substitute for a mid-credit sequence, teasing the future. But, at the very end, after the drawings show Naru receiving praise from her tribe, they show multiple predator ships emerging from the clouds seemingly ready to attack. As the initial credits roll, the events of the film are recapped rather creatively, with drawings depicting everything. The moment that people have pointed to more as a tease for a sequel is stuck in the credits sequence. But I think that following Preywith another film about the Predators retrieving the pistol to tie up the Predator 2 moment would be stretching the concept a little thin. It’s entirely possible that they put the Raphael Adolini pistol in the film as a tease for a sequel. Some people have interpreted some moments or details as some sort of tease for a sequel. I worry that, given just how well-rounded Preyis, any attempt to create a follow-up would fall flat or feel forced. It’s a very cut-and-dry piece of storytelling. Naru (Amber Midthunder) and her companion Sarii (Coco) in Prey. By the time the story has reached its end, that is exactly what she’s done. Naru ( Amber Midthunder) is clearly defined from the beginning of the story as someone who wants to become a better and more well-respected hunter. One of my favorite attributes about Prey is just how tight it really is. Raphael Aolini’s gun: what it meansįirst off, I think it’s important to make this much clear: Preydoesn’t need a straight-up traditional sequel. But, before such news inevitably drops, I think I want to put my piece out there about what I think a sequel should look like. With a more than enthusiastic response to the Predator prequel film (you can read my review here) and Hulu declaring it the greatest premiere in the history of the service, news about a potential Prey sequel is heavily anticipated. Dan Trachtenberg’s Prey movie has finally been released, giving the Predatorfranchise much-needed revitalization.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |